john
New Member
Texas-12
Posts: 39
|
Post by john on Jun 30, 2012 8:37:56 GMT -5
"How would you and other delegates feel if Alex Easton Brown convened the CC2.0, then took a vote as to whether the delegates wanted to operate with him as chair under the agenda and voting system set up by MP and the SC or not. If "not" wins then he would open the floor for a vote for a chairperson. That person would then run the meeting from then on out and the delegates would decide on agenda, etc. if the delegates vote for Alex, then the predetermined agenda, etc. would be used."
More important than a vote is that the delegates be able to speak to the proposals pro and con.
|
|
john
New Member
Texas-12
Posts: 39
|
Post by john on Jun 30, 2012 8:38:28 GMT -5
"How would you and other delegates feel if Alex Easton Brown convened the CC2.0, then took a vote as to whether the delegates wanted to operate with him as chair under the agenda and voting system set up by MP and the SC or not. If "not" wins then he would open the floor for a vote for a chairperson. That person would then run the meeting from then on out and the delegates would decide on agenda, etc. if the delegates vote for Alex, then the predetermined agenda, etc. would be used."
More important than a vote is that the delegates be able to speak to the proposals pro and con.
|
|
|
Post by kelley805 on Jun 30, 2012 19:53:01 GMT -5
John Here is the latest agenda that I posted on page 2. It allows for nominations and voting for Chair,Sgt at Arms, Agenda, and allows for subcommittees to work in parallel. It also allows for voting by % aka consent or by counts. Hope it meets all your requirements. See you Monday. Mike Kelley Attachments:
|
|