|
Post by kjlowry on Jul 11, 2012 18:23:13 GMT -5
The email list has moved onto this discussion board forum and there are some questions about how to move forward that we could use some steering committee input on.
Firstly, I do not believe that the process from this point forward has been put into writing except perhaps in the record of the CC2.0 proceedings. The way I remember the proceedings was that there would be: 1. a style committee formed to work on the voted-on-Doc (23 page) in order to make the style of the grievances match and make the document more coherent and succinct. That committee had people that volunteered to serve, but it has not been OFFICIALLY formed or begun work as of yet.
2. Once the document was completed and ready to be voted on...the style committee was supposed to submit it to the delegates for a vote. I do not recall an announced method of doing that NOR do I know if there was a decision as to whether JUST the actual attending delegates would vote on the final doc or whether it would be opened up to ALL elected delegates.
Questions: Is there a way for the delegates to propose changes in language or structure to the Grievances Doc that was voted on?
Do we have a time frame established for the style committee to finish its work?
Do we have a way for the delegates to vote on the final Doc?
Will a SC representative keep looking in here in order that we can ask further questions and get further guidance on moving forward?
Thanks, KJ
|
|