|
Post by Julio Figueroa on Aug 6, 2012 22:41:47 GMT -5
I'm pleased to report that the Style Committee has been doing an outstanding job. The way things are going, I think we will all be very proud with the final document. Let's extend our thanks to Kathleen Kj Lowry, Tripp Jenkins, Kirsten Wilkerson, Cat Wilson, and Jennifer Egolf. I'd like to thank all of you for your patience as well. Give us a few more days and we will have this thing all wrapped and nice for ya. Thanks.
;D
|
|
|
Post by craigwood on Aug 10, 2012 20:57:24 GMT -5
CC2.0 Petition Voting Support System:
I am going to support a line item delegate vote on each Grievance/Solution item. Delegates can thus support the CC2.0 group’s best effort for the whole document to move forward, but identify a problem for a grievance or one of its solutions -- it’s an opt-out only for each item, with a reason chosen by that named delegate for the record.
You can tell us what level of opt-out reasons will work by responding to this post or your own post. Some possible opt-out reasons could be:
Grievances:
I do not support the concept of this grievance. I support the concept but the wording is too weak. I support the concept but the grievance is not well worded, not focused on the real problem(s).
Solutions:
I do not support the concept of this solution. The solution is incomplete or not focused on the real problem. The solution will cause more problems. The solution is unconstitutional. The solution can not be enforced as drafted. The solution is too weak to do what needs to be done. The solution would cost too much, take too much time to work. I have or support a better solution.
We need to let the delegates vote with reasons, not just opt-out right now without good feed back. This ranking vote can be set up within a week and be sent out by email to all delegates -- not just the few who are active on the boards. Your CC2.0 Delegate Center needs to function with your votes.
|
|